The adoption of the UAE Federal Arbitration Law (UAE FAL) was welcomed with great acclaim in June last year. It entered into force on 16 June 2018 and has since applied to arbitrations seated in the UAE, including those pending at the time of entry into force of the new law. The UAE FAL is, in relevant part, albeit not exclusively, based on the UNCITRAL Model Law, which in itself has lifted the perception of UAE-seated arbitrations that are governed by the new law to a new level. The UAE is now seen as a Model Law jurisdiction that complies with international best standards and practice. Continue reading
The UAE Federal Arbitration Law one year in: taking stock
Anti-arbitration injunctions: the implications of Sabbagh
In Sabbagh v Khoury, the Court of Appeal confirmed the court’s jurisdiction to grant an anti-arbitration injunction (AAI) in exceptional cases where it would be vexatious and oppressive because of proceedings in England. Additionally, it held that it was not necessary for the exercise of that jurisdiction to show that England was forum conveniens. Continue reading
Balancing foreign investor protections with domestic policy initiatives in South Africa
One should not underestimate the positive effect of foreign direct investment on a country’s growth and development and the importance of creating an investor-friendly environment in uncertain economic times Continue reading
The New York Convention is regarded as one of the key drivers behind the success of international arbitration. More than 60 years after the adoption of the New York Convention, will the Singapore Mediation Convention make similar strides for mediation? Continue reading
In the era of big data, parties need to ensure their digital approach to arbitration is diligent. Continue reading
STC v Betamax and the impact of public policy considerations on the enforceability of international arbitral awards
On 31 May 2019, the Supreme Court of Mauritius set aside an arbitral award in State Trading Corporation v Betamax on grounds of public policy. Continue reading
In General Dynamics United Kingdom Ltd v The State of Libya, the English Court of Appeal, comprised of Etherton MR and Longmore and Flaux LJJ recently gave judgment reversing, in part, a decision of Males LJ in the English Commercial Court. Males LJ had held that service of an order permitting the claimant to enforce an arbitral award against a sovereign state must be effected through the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) (see my earlier blog). Continue reading
Arbitration means flexibility, or so we are always told. But flexibility to do what? To fly around the world attending multiple meetings in remote locations? To create huge bundles of documents for hearings and insist that a full cast of witnesses attend too? It sometimes seems that way. Continue reading
As we saw in our previous post, Switzerland affords award creditors with a clear legal framework that facilitates the recognition and enforcement of their claims in Switzerland. This legal regime varies depending on whether: Continue reading
The short answer is yes, although the exact process by which compliance may be enforced is a little more complicated. Continue reading