- June 24, 2020
Arbitration agreement scope and arbitrability: Bridgehouse (Bradford No. 2) Ltd v BAE Systems Plc
How pro-arbitration are the courts of England and Wales? How pro-arbitration should they be? A recent decision of the Court of Appeal indicates that the answer to both questions is “very much”. The decision, and the proceedings which led to them, illustrate just how far the system encourages arbitration now.
- June 5, 2020
Arbitrator’s liability for costs: C Ltd v (1) D (2) X
A while ago, I wrote a summary of the decision in Cofely Limited v Bingham and another. That decision concerned the costs position following the removal of an arbitrator under section 24 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996) and, in particular, the following question: is the arbitrator potentially liable for the costs of the application to … Continue reading Arbitrator’s liability for costs: C Ltd v (1) D (2) X →
- December 15, 2016
When pets attack: of puppies, kittens and being careful what you ask for
If you are thinking of buying a new pet, “cats or dogs?” may be a reasonable question to ask. But what if the answer is “cats in town, dogs in the countryside”? Is that a non-answer? Or does it express what you most needed to know? If that is a good answer for yourself when … Continue reading When pets attack: of puppies, kittens and being careful what you ask for →
- November 1, 2016
When the kings depart: costs and the removal of an arbitrator
Few practitioners in the arbitration field will not have heard of the judgment in Cofely Limited v Bingham and another. As noted in a number of places, Hamblen J (as he then was) in the Commercial Court gave a judgment in favour of removal of the defendant as arbitrator under section 24(1)(a) of the Arbitration … Continue reading When the kings depart: costs and the removal of an arbitrator →